To The Editor:
Nationwide user fees (fuel tax & etc.) cover about 50% of road construction and maintenance costs. The balance is from general funds, income tax, property tax, and etc. User fees historically covered more of the costs than is the case today. Oregon is on the low end of pay for use funding.
The city’s proposal for a Transportation Utility Fee is inequitable, especially for those who do not own or operate heavy motor vehicles. User fees, fuel tax, parking fees, registration fees based on weight, and etc. would be more equitable.
Many homeowners have already spent thousands of dollars for sidewalks in order to dedicate roadways to heavy motor vehicle traffic and storage; homeowners are also bearing the cost of sidewalk maintenance.
Does the city of Creswell know which users cause the greatest damage to the city streets?
Our roads need repair, I hope we can find an equitable way to finance repairs and find ways to reduce maintenance by reducing traffic.
Ed Gunderson, Creswell
Letters to the Editor are personal views on matters of local public debate or interest, generally written in 300 words or less. The Chronicle is a hyper-local news source; letters relating to national politics will not be published.
You may email your letter or drop it off at the newsroom by noon Sunday to be printed in that week’s edition.
■ 655 A St., Suite E in Springfield
All letters must be signed in full and include the address and telephone number of the writer for verification purposes. If a letter cannot be verified, it will not be published.
Editors reserve the right to hold letters that use offensive language, misinformation or mudslinging. All letters are subject to editing for clarity and length.