CANDIDATES AT A GLANCE
- Zone 1 – Jeffrey Cooper and Jerry Rust. Denise Diamond retires from her seat.
- Zone 3 – Incumbent Julie Weismann and Devon Lawson
- Zone 4 – Incumbent Austin Fölnagy and Richard Andrew Vasquez
- At large – Jesse Alejandra Maldonado
What are the most significant challenges LCC faces today?
Jeffrey Cooper, Zone 1: I think the biggest challenge for any educational institution, including LCC, is finding its niche and doing it well. There are always finite resources, so it is important to determine what the greatest needs are for the population we serve and, from there, how we can best meet those needs. It takes outreach, research, really listening, and also being willing to ask tough questions and make difficult decisions.
Jerry Rust, Zone 1: We are an aging society with fewer college-age students, and staying relevant in this fast-changing world is crucial. Yet, we also encounter internal bickering among board members, as well as between the board and the administration and other college groups. We must also consider the potential interference from the federal government.
Julie Weismann, Incumbent, Zone 3: Funding stability and sustainability are the most significant challenges facing LCC today. With the federal attacks on education causing funding uncertainty, the college must find unique ways to balance keeping costs low for students, offering competitive wages for faculty and staff, and providing the quality training and education to meet our community’s workforce needs. LCC’s budgeting cycle begins in May, and the board and budget committee will be facing unknown levels of federal and state funding, while also being encouraged by increasing enrollment and student retention. We will need a pragmatic approach to our budgeting in the face of this uncertainty, especially regarding funding, which makes it challenging to plan and forecast.
Devon Lawson, Zone 3: Lane Community College faces three major challenges—first, affordability. Students are struggling with the rising costs of attending college, while wages have not kept up. LCC was founded to provide opportunities for all, but without proactive leadership, we risk leaving too many behind. Second, governance. The Board’s recent gridlock and failure to fill vacancies have shaken public confidence. Students, staff, and taxpayers deserve a Board that works together, not one that is stuck in stalemates. LCC stands at a crossroads in its approach to supporting diversity, equity, and inclusion. The closure of the DEI office and the lack of clear action have left many students feeling isolated. At a time when public education is under attack nationwide, LCC must recommit to being a welcoming and inclusive institution. As a working student and someone who helps oversee LCC’s $125 million bond, I understand that good stewardship means more than balancing budgets; it means building trust, expanding access, and staying true to the college’s mission.
Austin Fölnagy, Incumbent, Zone 4: We are seeing potential shifts in support from the Federal level, which can have serious impacts on our funding and ability to provide for our students. To safeguard our institution, we must proactively develop state-level funding strategies to continue supporting the vital programs within our college, as well as wrap-around services for students and pathways to employment. I am committed to ensuring that each student, staff member, and member of the LCC community can rely on the Board to lead them through turbulent times as an educational institution.
Richard Andrew Vasquez, Zone 4: Some of LCC’s challenges include financial instability, declining enrollment, and increasing student needs for digital literacy.
Jesse Maldonado, At Large: Enrollment is number one. Though we are seeing a positive enrollment trend for the first time in recent years, we must maintain this momentum. Working with the administration and staff to ensure we’re doing outreach into our community, specifically in schools, through programs like TRIO and TRIO STEM to let students know they can find their passion at LCC and that it provides unparalleled opportunities for them. Continued partnership with school districts throughout LCC’s service area is a necessity, not a want, to ensure we reach students early, share the offerings of LCC, and highlight the potential for them to secure a living-wage job through the training and courses LCC provides. The budget, like that of any public institution nowadays, will be a challenge. As a board, we will need to make tough decisions, guided by the knowledge and expertise of the administration and staff. However, I won’t be afraid to make a decision when the time comes.
The LCC Board approved a 3.1% tuition rate increase, effective this summer, which raises the rate by $4.50 per credit hour. Many students are facing economic hardships, working longer hours, or experiencing increased financial pressures due to various factors, including rising living costs. What ideas do you have for balancing the need for affordability with the college’s financial sustainability?
Cooper: The key is always how to help our economy thrive. A thriving economy helps increase tax revenue, creates opportunities for increased earning potential for employment, and reduces the cost of living expenses. Therefore, our considerations always need to include how the work we are doing at LCC is improving the lives of our students, how that is driving the programs we are offering, and how that is meeting the needs of employers. All of these work in tandem to help with students’ affordability and earning potential.
Rust: We should strengthen our relationships with all the school principals and counselors in Lane County. Additionally, we need to focus on marketing; LCC has a compelling story to tell, and we must ensure it reaches the broader community. We should also consider entering the campus housing business.
Weismann: LCC can’t do this alone, we need community partners to support our students – one way could be through addressing housing and food insecurity by expanding or developing a referral program with youth serving local organizations. Chances are if a student is in shelter or unstably housed, they probably received help with registering for LCC, maybe there is additional ways to provide wraparound services for this student. Perhaps we can collaborate with Food for Lane County to establish a food pantry for low-income students in the area. Another approach could be to work with local or regional businesses that need skilled employees to address our community’s workforce needs. Perhaps there is a way for them to help subsidize the cost of that training, such as through internships or apprenticeships. Students cannot carry the burden of LCC’s financial stability – that needs to come from all corners of our community. I am optimistic that we can find new opportunities to improve student success and improve our community’s success, too.
Lawson: Raising tuition should always be a last resort. I grew up in a trailer park. As someone who works in fast food, uses EBT, and is a dual-enrolled student, I know what even $4.50 more per credit means to families already stretched thin. Students are the backbone of LCC, and pricing them out undermines our college’s mission. But I also recognize LCC’s financial constraints. We need bold, forward-thinking strategies that protect both access and stability. I would push for increased state-level funding, explore partnerships to cover critical student costs like transportation and books, and improve LCC’s outreach to adult learners and returning students, growing enrollment in smart, sustainable ways. We can also reduce expenses by investing in energy efficiency and digital modernization. Small steps, such as expanding affordable on-campus food options or providing emergency grant access, can make a big difference in retention. Most of all, we need student voices at the table when budget decisions are made. If elected, I’ll bring that voice, not just mine, but the many working-class students whose needs have been ignored for too long.
Fölnagy: During my tenure on the board, I have prioritized inclusive conversations with students and focused on action-oriented budget development. We must also recognize that the cost of living has a huge impact on students’ ability to survive. Although we have little direct influence on this as a board, we can still advocate for statewide policies that support the basic needs of students. Policies that support housing, transportation, and other cost-of-living impacts. I plan to fight to continue to keep tuition affordable and LCC as a viable pathway for those in our community. Working to secure funding for comprehensive wrap-around services such as housing, food access, and mental health services to support students and their needs, both locally and statewide.
Vasquez: Increase the availability and generosity of scholarships, grants, and other forms of financial aid to help more students cover their costs. Be more visible to the community and donors. Consider implementing price caps for tuition, either through federal government mandates or limitations on annual tuition increases, and seeking partnerships with businesses, non-profits, and other educational institutions to collaborate on research, shared facilities, and co-sponsored events. These viable tactics have been effective in my experience as a Trustee.
Maldonado: The board should never lose sight of the fact that we are a community college, and many students turn to the college because of its affordability. We are unfortunately living in a financially unstable time, and funding sources are changing or even being shuttered by the current administration. So, we must be creative in how we continue to fund the college moving forward. But as a board, we must ensure that students’ basic needs are met and they can stay enrolled. Students who have their needs met are more likely to stay in school – dropping out is both very costly for the institution and for them as a student. We can provide information on SNAP enrollment for Titans because many students, unfortunately, don’t know that they are eligible for assistance. We also know that every dollar of SNAP is a boost to the local economy. Additionally, we need to continue working with our state delegation to increase funding from Salem to LCC. If we can increase funding from the state and other resources locally, there is an opportunity to help lower the cost for our students.
LCC has at least six student identity groups, and recent shifts in federal policies regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion have created uncertainty. What actions would you take to ensure the college remains committed to inclusive practices?
Cooper: I firmly believe all students should have access to all of the offerings at LCC. We need to have students from all walks of life giving their input on the decisions that we make. And if they aren’t coming to us, we need to go to them to listen and learn.
Rust: I believe we should embrace internationalism; LCC could be a beacon of friendship for international students by offering tailor-made classes to attract them, such as advanced English courses. We should also consider adding Asian languages when and where feasible.
Weismann: We have a wonderfully diverse student body, and we need to reaffirm our commitment to being a sanctuary for all students and to reaffirm our equity values by creating a welcoming and safe environment for students, especially those who are targeted and feel afraid. We can continue to provide necessary signage and expand training to prepare for any action directed at students or LCC, as well as offer important emotional support services. I would ensure our students feel heard and supported. Perhaps we could invite different student groups to address the board as part of our monthly agenda, allowing all of us to gain a better understanding of the concerns and challenges facing all students. And I will continue to support and empower our Student Board Trustee to speak up and help the board understand how actions before the board would impact students.
Lawson: Every student deserves to feel safe, respected, and valued, no matter who they are. Diversity is not just a value at LCC, it’s one of our greatest strengths. As federal policies change, it is more important than ever that we stand firm in protecting opportunities for all students. If elected, I will advocate for reopening and properly supporting LCC’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion office. I will work to ensure that our student identity groups are fully funded and have a strong voice in decision-making processes. And I will fight to make sure that college policies remain firmly aligned with civil rights protections, even when federal leadership backslides. LCC must be a place where everyone, whether they are first-generation students, LGBTQ+, students of color, veterans, or immigrants, can thrive and belong. Protecting inclusion is not a political issue; it’s the heart of who we are as a community college and as a democracy.
Fölnagy: I am committed to protecting access to education for ALL, regardless of immigration status, economic standing or individual circumstances. I am dedicated to ensuring all students have the support and opportunities necessary to achieve their educational, career and life goals. I will continue to support and look for ways to make all students at LCC feel supported and safe in this learning environment. Part of that is ensuring they have access to resources and tools that not only make them feel supported but also provide a sense of belonging in our LCC community. When I say meeting students where they are at, I am talking about trying our best to support the diversity of background and lived experiences that students bring with them. That also means making sure our Student Life and Leadership Development is working to provide those opportunities through Clubs and Organizations at LCC.
Vasquez: Ensure all policies and procedures align with inclusive principles, covering areas like admissions, academic standards, student conduct, and employment practices. Regularly review and adjust financial plans to adapt to changing circumstances and ensure long-term sustainability. Foster diverse backgrounds, partner with organizations that embrace these ongoing shifts, and create a more campus culture.
Maldonado: I will stand firmly and publicly against the Trump Administration as they continue their crusade against marginalized communities, immigrants, and other minorities. Donald Trump does not get to decide who the Constitution protects, the founding fathers did that for him. Diversity makes us stronger, not weaker, and Lane Community College must be an institution that serves all students fairly, equally, and justly. I will always support initiatives that strengthen our student body, our institution, and our community. Fighting for our Overlooked and Under-Represented: We must ensure we do everything in our power to increase enrollment, especially in our often-overlooked and underserved communities, and to make sure our students have the support they need to succeed. Promoting Educational Opportunities: Advancing racial justice requires proactive steps to dismantle systemic barriers and ensure every student has the opportunity to succeed. I will advocate for policies that promote equity in hiring, curriculum development, and student support services. This includes expanding mentorship programs for students of color, investing in faculty diversity, and creating spaces where marginalized voices are heard and valued.
Bullying allegations are currently under investigation regarding the LCC board chair and the school’s president. How would you navigate tensions among board members, and how would you foster open communication and collaboration across the LCC campus?
Cooper: The LCC Board of Education should not be partisan and it should not be political. I am neither of those things. I have a background in the trades and in working with students. I serve as chair of the LCC Advanced Tech/CTE Advisory Committee. I bring this experience as well as common sense and integrity to the Board. I am a solutions-oriented person. I will work to steer all conversations away from political agendas, ask direct and tough questions and seek solutions with the students’ success at the center of it all.
Rust: The board and the administration at LCC hit a rough patch, leading to dissension on the board and charges of bullying. Former Senator Mark Hatfield said the art of politics is the art of human relations. I have gotten to know the parties involved, and I believe they are good people. A new board will take over in July. A feeling of optimism is in the air. I will use my experience to set a good example and look for ways to improve relations at the board level and between the board and the president’s office.
Weismann: After the election, we will have at least two new board members, and this new board will elect its chair and vice chair in July. Most of the current board members have served for under 2 years. I would insist on board training for all members on their role and responsibilities as Board of Education Trustees. In addition, I would insist on extensive training for the chair and vice chair to ensure their understanding of what their roles are and are not, along with some training in parliamentary procedure. In July, to get us started as a new board, I will ask for someone skilled in working with public community college boards to facilitate our board retreat and help us build trust among ourselves.
Lawson: When tensions arise, the key is to focus on respect, transparency, and the mission of the college, not personalities. If elected, I will bring a steady, team-oriented approach to the board. I believe we must set clear standards for behavior, hold ourselves accountable to those standards, and model respectful disagreement. I advocate for open lines of communication between the board, faculty, staff, and students, including regular listening sessions and better public engagement. I believe in mediation and restorative practices where appropriate, but above all, I believe in prioritizing the needs of students and the community. It’s time to rebuild trust on the board by fostering a culture where everyone feels heard, respected, and focused on working together.
Fölnagy: I will continue to foster open communication and collaboration on the board, just as I have always done, by promoting a culture rooted in transparency, collaboration, and mutual respect. I believe that effective governance starts with clear communication and a shared commitment to serving our students, staff, and broader community. During my time on the board, I’ve prioritized inclusive conversations and action-focused policy development. That means ensuring every board member feels heard, every voice, especially students’, is valued, and we approach challenges with a spirit of partnership rather than partisanship. At the end of the day, we don’t have to agree on everything to work effectively, but we must stay rooted in our shared responsibility to students.
Vasquez: Yes, I would seek opportunities to collaborate with the administration, the college president, and board members to help navigate the outcome of the investigation. Some encourage board members to listen to each other’s viewpoints without interruption, even if they disagree. Samples I have experienced may include encouraging board members to listen to each other’s views without interruption, even if they disagree, and using clear and respectful language when communicating, avoiding accusatory or condescending tones.
Maldonado: Our North Star as a board is ensuring that LCC remains a beacon of opportunity in our community — we cannot lose sight of this. We owe it to our students, to our constituents, and to the institution as a whole to let this process play out and ensure that the allegations are investigated. Moving forward, we, as board members, must also ensure we remain collegial with one another. An environment where there is no room for conversing with each other does not provide for productive leadership and governance. Having served on numerous boards and in elective office previously, communication, respect, and humility are vital to governing successfully.
If a large portion of the community was upset about a decision made by the board, how would you address the community’s concerns?
Cooper: I really think conflict should be addressed by being honest, direct and respectful. I would work at the front of a decision to bring various parties to the table, and reach out again after a difficult decision. I would try to continue to have an open door to the various sides of an issue. However, I would also try to lead to ensure that we don’t dwell on controversial decisions as a Board and will move past them.
Rust: If a large portion of the community objects to a board policy, I would definitely reconsider. However, I would want to hold a public hearing to hear both sides of the discussion before taking further action. Usually, when there is a lot of smoke, there is a fire, and the board should be flexible in its policymaking role.
Weismann: Depending on the issue and what a large portion means, holding a special public meeting to hear from the community might be a solution. … Public meeting law insists that board members should speak and listen in public meetings together, since none of us can speak on behalf of the board.
Lawson: Community trust is at the heart of good governance. If many in the community were upset about a board decision, I would make it a top priority to listen carefully, respectfully, and without defensiveness. I would advocate for town halls, listening sessions, and surveys to gather community feedback and understand concerns in a structured way. Transparency is key: explaining the reasons behind decisions, offering clear information, and being open to reevaluating policies when warranted. As a public servant, I know the Board is accountable to the people, and building trust means treating every concern seriously, with empathy, honesty, and respect.
Fölnagy: I hope to have a fully open and transparent process, so even if the community is not 100% happy with the results, they at least feel like their concerns were incorporated and taken seriously in the process. I want voters to know that my commitment to Lane Community College and our broader community is deeply personal. I’m here to build a college that truly reflects the needs of our community. I’ve been a union member, a small business owner, and an advocate for working families. I know what it means to face economic uncertainty, and I believe education should be a pathway out of it, not another barrier. As I have done before, I remain committed to fostering a consistent, supportive, and reliable learning environment, not only for students and teachers, but for every member of our community who finds their safe space at Lane Community College.
Vasquez: In my experience, the board would decide to host an open college forum to communicate with the community about their concerns. This would create a space for informal discussion and information sharing, allowing community members to voice their opinions and ask questions.
Maldonado: It’s important to listen and be receptive. I care first and foremost about what is on the minds of our students and staff. If there is concern, my initial questions will be pointed towards those who are directly impacted by our decisions — the students and staff. Additionally, we must ensure that we provide students and community members with ample opportunities to have their voices heard at our meetings and otherwise, to ensure they are never excluded from the democratic process. As elected officials and as a board, we must make sure that we not only communicate with students and citizens about our decisions but also listen to them and their concerns as we make decisions for LCC and our community.
